<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Use Style Sheets?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xhtmltips.co.uk/2007/03/18/why-use-style-sheets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xhtmltips.co.uk/2007/03/18/why-use-style-sheets/</link>
	<description>... coding abc ... well formed and valid XML with CSS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: freelancer</title>
		<link>http://www.xhtmltips.co.uk/2007/03/18/why-use-style-sheets/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>freelancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xhtmltips.co.uk/?p=13#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Using CSS for coloring, setting sizes, etc. is more or less compatible among browsers. But when it comes to positioning using CSS... I suspect you would say it is not good, but I would rather use tables. Tables are very well compatible among browsers and I do not have to spend hours debugging why it works in one browser and does not work in another (or even another browser version). Maybe i think so because i have almost no CSS experience.

&lt;strong&gt;xht:&lt;/strong&gt; CSS should also be used for positioning, although it can be tricky to get the desired effect in all browsers, it then becomes possible to apply separate style sheets for different displays. For example: print, low-res, accessibility, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using CSS for coloring, setting sizes, etc. is more or less compatible among browsers. But when it comes to positioning using CSS&#8230; I suspect you would say it is not good, but I would rather use tables. Tables are very well compatible among browsers and I do not have to spend hours debugging why it works in one browser and does not work in another (or even another browser version). Maybe i think so because i have almost no CSS experience.</p>
<p><strong>xht:</strong> CSS should also be used for positioning, although it can be tricky to get the desired effect in all browsers, it then becomes possible to apply separate style sheets for different displays. For example: print, low-res, accessibility, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
